|
Post by Lucas on Mar 29, 2016 12:08:05 GMT -8
I figured I'd do this all in one, because it all relates to the number of players we have on our rosters.
I've heard some suggestions about possibly making our starting lineups (22 players) a little smaller. Some suggestions have included cutting back to 1 TE, or reducing the number of IDPs we start. Here's my idea for new starting lineups:
1 QB 2 RB 3 WR 1 TE 1 RB/WR/TE Flex 1 WR/TE Flex 1 K
This way we can still do 3 TE sets if you are deep at the position, while reducing the minimum number of starters so you aren't punished if you don't carry enough to recover from injuries, bye week hell, etc.
Defense would look something like this:
2 DL 2 LB 3 DB 2 Flex (DL/LB/DB)
This seems to allow the most flexibility in our defensive lineups without putting too much emphasis on one position. With the move to fleaflicker there is also a chance to try positional scoring, adding another level to defensive strategy... though the specifics on that are best saved for another discussion thread.
What are your thoughts on this guys? Do you have any issues with our rosters or starting lineups? Any suggestions to improve them? With the proposed changes, we would only be starting 19 players instead of 22. Should those 3 slots be turned into bench players, or should overall roster size decrease? Let me know what you think!
|
|
dan
Junior Member
Posts: 54
|
Post by dan on Apr 4, 2016 16:20:18 GMT -8
im down with this roster set up
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Apr 12, 2016 17:31:00 GMT -8
my favorite lineup requirement is this:
1 QB 2 RB 3 WR 1 TE 1 flex (RB, WR, TE) 1 kicker
2 DL 3 LB 3 DB 1 flex
That would give us 9 starters on each side of the ball with a little more room for flexibility with the Flex spots.
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Apr 12, 2016 17:31:45 GMT -8
I like it when it's equal offense and defense
|
|
|
Post by Laz on Apr 12, 2016 17:41:30 GMT -8
im down with this roster set up +1
|
|