|
Post by Lucas on Apr 8, 2016 16:36:35 GMT -8
In our quest to balance scoring on defense, Defensive line has generally been the position that scores much lower than the other positions. What can we do to fix this? Should we make tackles worth slightly more for DL than other positions (say, 2 points for DL and 1.5 for LB/DB), or maybe add point bonuses for certain milestones (2+ TFL, 2+ sacks)? Or are we ok with how things are?
|
|
|
Post by Laz on Apr 12, 2016 17:36:32 GMT -8
This is likely the one rule change I really would slam.
It may not be popular, but I like nearly 4 points for a sack.
A sack for a DL is like a TD for an offensive player. Just my view.
|
|
|
DL scoring
Apr 12, 2016 17:43:07 GMT -8
via mobile
Laz likes this
Post by Dave on Apr 12, 2016 17:43:07 GMT -8
I agree with 4 pts per sack
|
|
|
Post by Laz on Apr 12, 2016 17:46:19 GMT -8
It helps to even out DL scoring versus the DB/LB, especially more heavy tacklers.
You can have a good, explosive DL who doesn't rack up the tackles who gets 2 sacks in a game. 8 points right there. 4pts doesn't make them too overpowering, strikes a good balance.
I'll have to relook at our exact defensive scoring to see if that creates imbalance.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew on Apr 12, 2016 17:48:42 GMT -8
We can make sacks worth more, but I'm not in favor of artificially propping up DL scoring by making their tackles worth more than other IDP tackles.
|
|